PSYC22004 - Clinical Psychology Engagement and Evaluation Project

Showing: 2026 HE Term 1
General Information

Unit Synopsis

This unit forms the capstone project of the Master of Clinical Psychology course. In this unit, you will conduct a clinical psychology project in which you will engage a community-based partner to conduct a project. The project may involve research or an intervention to be evaluated. You will design and conduct the project, evaluate the project by collecting relevant data, and produce a written report of your project and evaluation.

Details

Level Postgraduate
Unit Level 9
Credit Points 12
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 4
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.25
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites

Students must be enrolled in CG17 Master of Clinical Psychology or CM49 Master of Clinical Psychology (Advanced Entry).

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 2 - 2026

Term 2 - 2026 Profile
Online Rockhampton

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 12-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 25 hours of study per week, making a total of 300 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

Previous Feedback

Term 2 - 2025 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 50.00% (`Agree` and `Strongly Agree` responses), based on a 46.15% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Unit Coordinator
Feedback:
Students appreciated the regular meeting times to discuss the progress of their projects.

Recommendation:
Continue to offer regular meeting times for students to check in with the Unit Coordinator about the progress of their project.

Action Taken:
Regular meeting times were maintained as part of fortnightly tutorials, providing students with structured opportunities to check in and discuss project progress.
Source: Unit Coordinator
Feedback:
Students enjoyed the opportunity to apply their research skills to a practical, community-based project.

Recommendation:
Continue to have community-based projects as the focus of this unit.

Action Taken:
Community-based projects remained the focus of the unit, ensuring students continued to apply research skills in practical, real-world contexts.
Source: Student feedback (in-class).
Feedback:
Students appreciated the resources provided on the Moodle site that supported each stage of their community engagement project.

Recommendation:
Maintain and continue to improve the Moodle site to ensure comprehensive, well-organised resources are available for all components of the project.

Action Taken:
In Progress
Source: Student feedback (in-class).
Feedback:
Some students expressed concern about presenting multiple sessions as part of their community engagement project, particularly the need to design new resources for each session.

Recommendation:
Work closely with students to help them structure their projects and timelines in a way that best fits their community partner setting. Encourage the use of existing resources where appropriate, while supporting the development of new materials when necessary.

Action Taken:
In Progress
Unit Learning Outcomes
This information will not be available until 8 weeks before term.
To see Learning Outcomes from an earlier availability, please search via a previous term.