SAFE20017 - Human Factors in Complex Systems

General Information

Unit Synopsis

This advanced level unit introduces you to the practices and principles of Human Factors and examines the ways that humans function in complex socio-technical environments and organisational safety systems. This unit discusses the core principles of physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics and provides the foundational knowledge required for the discipline of Human Factors. You will learn and apply knowledge in the area of anthropometric variation of the human body to end-user design enhancements as well as discussing concepts of job design in relation to psychological considerations including mental workloads, fatigue management, teamwork and job-fit concepts.

Details

Level Postgraduate
Unit Level 8
Credit Points 6
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 2
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.125
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites There are no pre-requisites for the unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 2 - 2023

Term 2 - 2023 Profile
Online
Term 2 - 2024 Profile
Online

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes – in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 6-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 12.5 hours of study per week, making a total of 150 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

Assessment Task Weighting
1. Group Discussion 20%
2. Written Assessment 40%
3. Written Assessment 40%

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University’s Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

To view Past Exams,
please login
Previous Feedback

Term 2 - 2022 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 100.00% (`Agree` and `Strongly Agree` responses), based on a 31.25% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Have Your Say Feedback
Feedback
I liked that the resources on the site were organised, and easy to find. I also liked that each week had dot points for you to gauge how far behind you might be. The learning guides were also a neat summary of the weeks content with some good reflective exercises.
Recommendation
Keep the weekly content on the Moodle site and the learning guides so that students can get a neat summary and some reflective exercises.
Action Taken
The weekly content and learning guides to support students were kept for this year's offering.
Source: Have Your Say Feedback
Feedback
The lectures could include more links to videos or other HF-related activities to make it more engaging, and also have more academic and historical references.
Recommendation
Consider adding more video content and relevant academic and historical references to the weekly lecture material.
Action Taken
A recommendation for this unit is to look at the possibility of adding more videos of real-world applications. This will be examined for the next offering.
Source: SUTE Comments
Feedback
More general discussion throughout the lectures around real-world applications of concepts and general HFE approaches would be helpful.
Recommendation
It is recommended to make sure that real-world application examples can be given during the lectures.
Action Taken
Nil.
Source: SUTE Comments
Feedback
Consider using video lectures to cover some of the content, similar to the excellent examples given in SAFE20018 Fatigue Risk Management.
Recommendation
It is recommended to review the video lectures that students found helpful in another unit SAFE20018 Fatigue Risk Management to see how these could be embedded in this unit.
Action Taken
Nil.
Source: SUTE Comments
Feedback
Excellent knowledge and relevant content. Excellent communication, timely and detailed assessment feedback and great resources during the course. Assessment details, marking rubric, assessment criteria and the assessment checklists were an extremely welcome additions.
Recommendation
It is recommended to keep the current content and assessment support resources which were favourably received by students based on the SUTE comments.
Action Taken
Nil.
Unit learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:

  1. Demonstrate an advanced level knowledge of Human Factors principles and practices across the domains of physical, cognitive, environmental and organisational ergonomics in complex systems
  2. Apply knowledge of Human Factors to analyse the appropriateness of fit between end user design in relation to equipment and tasks
  3. Evaluate the contribution of cognitive ergonomics in the assessment of equipment design and the introduction of new technology in complex systems
  4. Discuss how the concepts of organisational job design relate to psychological considerations including mental workloads, fatigue management, team work and job-fit concepts in systems theory and its relationship to safety
  5. Critique contemporary theories of human performance in complex systems.

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Group Discussion • •
2 - Written Assessment • •
3 - Written Assessment • •
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
• Advanced Level
• Professional Level
Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4 5
1 - Knowledge • • • • •
2 - Communication • • • • •
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills • • • • •
4 - Research • • • • •
5 - Self-management • • • • •
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility • •
7 - Leadership • •
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
• Advanced Level
• Professional Level
Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 - Group Discussion • • • • • • •
2 - Written Assessment • • • • •
3 - Written Assessment • • • • • • •