Viewing Unit History

The information below is relevant from 09/03/2015 to 06/03/2016
Click Here to view current information

ENRP20003 - Engineering Research Project Implementation

General Information

Unit Synopsis

This course is designed so that students can complete an investigative study through the analysis of, reflection on and critique of, an area of their professional practice that was commenced in Engineering Research Project Planning. By completing this project, students will contribute to the body of knowledge for their discipline. Students will present their project in a thesis, a professional presentation and a technical paper.

Details

Level Postgraduate
Unit Level 9
Credit Points 12
Student Contribution Band SCA Band 2
Fraction of Full-Time Student Load 0.25
Pre-requisites or Co-requisites There are no pre-requisites for the unit.

Important note: Students enrolled in a subsequent unit who failed their pre-requisite unit, should drop the subsequent unit before the census date or within 10 working days of Fail grade notification. Students who do not drop the unit in this timeframe cannot later drop the unit without academic and financial liability. See details in the Assessment Policy and Procedure (Higher Education Coursework).

Class Timetable View Unit Timetable
Residential School No Residential School

Unit Availabilities from Term 1 - 2014

Term 1 - 2017 Profile
Distance
Term 2 - 2017 Profile
Distance
Term 1 - 2018 Profile
Distance
Melbourne
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2018 Profile
Distance
Melbourne
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2019 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2019 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2020 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2020 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2021 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2021 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2022 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2022 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2023 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2023 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2024 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2024 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Rockhampton
Term 1 - 2025 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton
Term 2 - 2025 Profile
Melbourne
Online
Perth
Rockhampton

Attendance Requirements

All on-campus students are expected to attend scheduled classes - in some units, these classes are identified as a mandatory (pass/fail) component and attendance is compulsory. International students, on a student visa, must maintain a full time study load and meet both attendance and academic progress requirements in each study period (satisfactory attendance for International students is defined as maintaining at least an 80% attendance record).

Assessment Overview

Recommended Student Time Commitment

Each 12-credit Postgraduate unit at CQUniversity requires an overall time commitment of an average of 25 hours of study per week, making a total of 300 hours for the unit.

Assessment Tasks

Assessment Task Weighting
1. Portfolio 100%

This is a graded unit: your overall grade will be calculated from the marks or grades for each assessment task, based on the relative weightings shown in the table above. You must obtain an overall mark for the unit of at least 50%, or an overall grade of ‘pass’ in order to pass the unit. If any ‘pass/fail’ tasks are shown in the table above they must also be completed successfully (‘pass’ grade). You must also meet any minimum mark requirements specified for a particular assessment task, as detailed in the ‘assessment task’ section (note that in some instances, the minimum mark for a task may be greater than 50%).

Consult the University's Grades and Results Policy for more details of interim results and final grades

Past Exams

To view Past Exams,
please login
Previous Feedback

Term 2 - 2023 : The overall satisfaction for students in the last offering of this course was 81.82% (`Agree` and `Strongly Agree` responses), based on a 36.67% response rate.

Feedback, Recommendations and Responses

Every unit is reviewed for enhancement each year. At the most recent review, the following staff and student feedback items were identified and recommendations were made.

Source: Unit evaluation
Feedback
Very happy with the course overall. Improvement has been made for clear feedback marking criteria.
Recommendation
Will continue this practice in the next offering.
Action Taken
The same approach has been practiced in this term.
Source: Unit evaluation
Feedback
Some feedback did not help to improve.
Recommendation
Reviewers will be more preciously allocated based on the project scope and expertise.
Action Taken
Reviewers have been allocated, based on the project scope and expertise.
Source: Unit evaluation
Feedback
The gap between the presentation and the final thesis submission is one week.
Recommendation
The final thesis submission can be moved a few days into exam week to increase the gap.
Action Taken
The final thesis submission has been moved to exam week to increase the gap between the two assessments.
Source: SUTE
Feedback
Availability of the software and their license renewal
Recommendation
The students and supervisors should work with the Unit Coordinator and Lab Manager to ensure software access and availability for project implementation prior to the start of the term.
Action Taken
In Progress
Source: SUTE
Feedback
Simulation lab access
Recommendation
The Unit Coordinator should arrange access to the simulation lab for all the project students with DFM from the beginning of the Term.
Action Taken
In Progress
Unit learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this unit, you will be able to:

  1. Analyse and synthesise information gathered in order to develop a sustainable and socially responsible solution.
  2. Demonstrate leadership by contributing to the body of knowledge related to the discipline area and participating in professional networks.
  3. Communicate findings using written and oral methods to inform both internal and external workplace practicing professionals.
  4. Critically reflect on self-performance and develop a plan for lifelong and professional learning.

n/a

Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Learning Outcomes
Assessment Tasks Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Portfolio • • • •
Alignment of Graduate Attributes to Learning Outcomes
• Professional Level
• Advanced Level
Graduate Attributes Learning Outcomes
1 2 3 4
1 - Knowledge • • • •
2 - Communication • • •
3 - Cognitive, technical and creative skills • • • •
4 - Research • • • •
5 - Self-management • • •
6 - Ethical and Professional Responsibility • • •
7 - Leadership • • •
Alignment of Assessment Tasks to Graduate Attributes
• Professional Level
• Advanced Level
Assessment Tasks Graduate Attributes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 - Portfolio • • • • • • •